The Wem ghost: a tall tale develops

Over a decade ago (in the days before blogs) I wrote a short web page debunking the Wem ‘ghost’ photograph, which had been taken the previous year and had begun to appear on web sites.

This photograph is a very striking picture, apparently of a young girl standing at the top of the stairs leading into a burning building. However, it does not take much close investigation to see that the picture is not of a young girl, and therefore likely not a ghost.

The ‘head’ is in front of the railings, and there is no body apparent, but if there is one, it must be way back behind the railings and inside the doorway at the top of the steps. So the ‘ghost’, if it is one, is shaped something like the front end of a giraffe.

From time to time I amuse myself by googling to see how the ‘Wem ghost’ meme is spreading on the Web. It took a few years before it really began to spread beyond the personal home page that started it and a handful of specialist ‘ghost’ sites. But now the story is all over the place,although I notice that many of the sites simply rip off the text of others, just as they rip off the copyright photograph that started it. There are not many sites where the photograph is given any critical analysis at all.

What is interesting is that the legend is starting to grow whenever the story is retold.  The fire that destroyed the old timber houses of the town in 1677, was, according to legend, caused by a young girl’s carelessness with a candle. The bloggers have now created new details to enhance the photograph: now she supposedly died in the 1677 fire or haunted the Town hall before it burned (although she had no connection with the building, which was built two and a half centuries after her life). The modern technology of the blog is being used to spread tall tales of a most old-fashioned kind. 

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “The Wem ghost: a tall tale develops

  1. Roger,

    Please, feel free to discuss any other aspects of this story here, if you have actual knowledge of the incident.

    I have not seen anything relating to this “ghost picture” that is not pure speculation after the event.

    The only evidence I have based my opinion on is the picture itself, and it is clear on moderately close inspection that it cannot be a picture of a young girl or any other human figure.

    Richard

  2. Richard
    I was involved in the aftermath of the fire at Wem Townhall from the very beginning ( 7.00 am the following morning) and with one exception the only person left who was involved.
    I worked for the construction company who did the initial safety work. I was the company’s Safety Manager and the person with most experience of fire damaged buildings.
    There is far more to this story than just Tony’s photograph.
    Please get in touch if you require further details.
    By the way I’m a total agnostic when it comes to ghost stories but in the course of 40 years in the construction industry I have encountered things for which I have no explanation
    Regards
    Roger

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s