Posted on August 4, 2009 by eveningperson
[BPSDB] Richard Wilson wrote this about a registered charity that is actively promoting AIDS denial.
This reminded me that, last year, I wrote to the same Charity Commission to complain about Frontline Homeopathy, which collects funds to promote homeopathy as “as an effective, low cost primary health care system” in developing countries. I got this [...]
Filed under: badscience, pseudomedicine, pseudoscience, quackery | Tagged: AIDS, AIDS denial, alternative medicine, bad science, CAM, charity, Charity Commission, complementary medicine, HIV, homeopathy, pseudomedicine, pseudoscience, quacks, scepticism | Leave a Comment »
Posted on June 25, 2009 by eveningperson
[BPSDB] There was no follow-up to the letter published prominently in the Guardian on 13 June 2009, on which I have commented before. I have followed this up with a letter to the paper’s Readers’ Editor. I actually wrote on two different issues, so this is an extract from the letter.
On Saturday 13 June you [...]
Filed under: badscience, pseudomedicine, pseudoscience, quackery, scepticism | Tagged: alternative medicine, CAM, complementary medicine, homeopathy, pseudomedicine, quacks, scepticism | Leave a Comment »
Posted on June 17, 2009 by eveningperson
[BPSDB] Here’s a description of the process for producing a homeopathic remedy, as described on Wikipedia:
…homeopaths use a process called “dynamisation” or “potentisation” whereby the remedy is diluted with alcohol or distilled water and then vigorously shaken by ten hard strikes against an elastic body in a process called “succussion”. … During the process of [...]
Filed under: badscience, pseudomedicine, pseudoscience, quackery, scepticism | Tagged: alternative medicine, bad science, CAM, complementary medicine, homeopathy, Homeopathy Awareness Week, pseudomedicine, pseudoscience, quacks, scepticism, science | Leave a Comment »
Posted on June 15, 2009 by eveningperson
[BPSDB] Some – what I consider outrageous – spinning of homeopathy in the Guardian, by three committed homeopathy-friendly physicians (Professor George Lewith, Professor of health research at the University of Southampton, Dr Michael Dixon, Medical director at the Prince’s Foundation for Integrated Health and Dr Peter Fisher, the Clinical director, Royal London Homoeopathic [...]
Filed under: badscience, pseudoscience, quackery, scepticism | Tagged: alternative medicine, CAM, complementary medicine, George Lewith, homeopathy, Michael Dixon, Peter Fisher, pseudomedicine, pseudoscience | 2 Comments »
Posted on June 12, 2009 by eveningperson
[BPSDB]There is this piece of flimflam on the web site of Neal’s Yard (the unethical selling company):
In more severe, acute situations the 200th potency (200C) may be administered once – this should not be repeated. Unless you have some knowledge and experience of Homoeopathy it is best to leave administration of 200th potency remedies to [...]
Filed under: general | Tagged: alternative medicine, CAM, complementary medicine, homeopathy, Neal's Yard, pseudomedicine, pseudoscience, quacks, scepticism | Leave a Comment »
Posted on May 27, 2009 by eveningperson
[BPSDB]The Guardian invited online readers to ask questions of Neal’s Yard, the self-described “ethical” skin and body care products firm. You can imagine the sort of questions people would want to ask. The comments thread is funny (and not at all insulting, unless you think that questioning someone’s assertions is in itself offensive). I expect [...]
Filed under: badscience, pseudoscience, quackery, scepticism | Tagged: alternative medicine, CAM, complementary medicine, Guardian, homeopathy, Neal's Yard, pseudomedicine, pseudoscience, quacks | Leave a Comment »
Posted on July 10, 2008 by eveningperson
[BPSDB] A few months ago someone commenting on a blog post (I think it was on Gimpy’s blog) described how some of his family were allegedly cured of illness by homeopathy, and asked ‘How can people deny my experience of this’?
I did not have time to reply on that occasion, but I thought that the [...]
Filed under: pseudoscience, scepticism, science | Tagged: evidence, explanation, homeopathy, pseudoscience, science, theory | Leave a Comment »
Posted on May 28, 2008 by eveningperson
The word ‘quantum’ appears commonly in two kinds of writing. The first is in physics, where the word simply means a very small amount of energy, or a small change in energy, such as when a molecule absorbs light and changes to a different form.
The second use occurs in all kinds of writings on ‘complementary’, [...]
Filed under: pseudoscience, scepticism, science | Tagged: alternative medicine, CAM, complementary medicine, homeopathy, quantum | Leave a Comment »
Posted on October 5, 2007 by eveningperson
This is a follow-up to my MP in in answer to his letter to me supporting homeopathy on the NHS.
Dear Mr Kawczynski,
Thank you for your reply of 31 August to my letter to you about the Early Day Motion on homeopathy. I would like to comment on your reply.
I wrote specifically about homeopathy. Other forms [...]
Filed under: pseudoscience | Tagged: bad science, homeopathy, pseudoscience | 1 Comment »